"Peer Evaluation Form"

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download "Peer Evaluation Form"

376 times
Rate (4.7 / 5) 23 votes
CHE 330
Peer Evaluation Form
Your name ___________________________________________________ Date ________________
Experiment ___________________________________________________ Team _______________
Using the scale below, circle the number that best corresponds to how well each team member met the
following four criteria.
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Strongly
1
2
3
4
5
Team Member's Name
_______________________________________________________
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points for this team member
_________________________
* * * * *
Team Member's Name
_______________________________________________________
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points for this team member
_________________________
1
CHE 330
Peer Evaluation Form
Your name ___________________________________________________ Date ________________
Experiment ___________________________________________________ Team _______________
Using the scale below, circle the number that best corresponds to how well each team member met the
following four criteria.
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Strongly
1
2
3
4
5
Team Member's Name
_______________________________________________________
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points for this team member
_________________________
* * * * *
Team Member's Name
_______________________________________________________
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points for this team member
_________________________
1
CHE 330
Peer Evaluation Form Continued
Your Name _________________________________________________________
Team Member's Name
_______________________________________________________
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points for this team member
_________________________
* * * * *
PLEASE EVALUATE YOUR OWN PERFORMANCE HERE
THIS INFORMATION IS FOR COMPARISON ONLY; IT WILL NOT BE USED IN CALCULATING YOUR GRADES
1. Member effectively performed her/his role functions
1
2
3
4
5
(e.g., did more than his share of experiment and writing, attended all team meetings,
wrote long sections of the report, worked long to document the data in lab notebook).
Member made useful contributions to the team project
1
2
3
4
5
2.
(e.g., worked on the hardest tasks, exhibited competence, made thorough data analysis,
studied complex formula and equipment and explained them to others).
Member contributed to efficient team procedures
1
2
3
4
5
3.
(e.g., organized the team, formulated goals, provided leadership, first to begin work
on experiment/report, gave ideas, confronted issues, identified action items).
Member had a constructive, open-minded and cooperative attitude1
2
3
4
5
4.
(e.g., courteous, friendly, enthusiastic, worked to reach consensus, good humored,
followed team ground rules, encouraged feedback on self, drew others out).
TOTAL points you'd give yourself
_________________________
Updated Aug. 2002, ODV
2
Page of 2