Project Peer Evaluation Form - the Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication

ADVERTISEMENT
Project Peer Evaluation Form
Your Name:___________________
Analysis of Algorithms & Data Structures
Peer evaluations are a part of each student’s project grade. Please complete this
form, place in a sealed envelope, and submit with your final report.
1. Using the scale below, evaluate your teammates on their contributions to
researching and developing the group report.
The person significantly contributed. Without this person, the
Excellent
4
quality of our final product would have been considerably
Contributor
diminished.
The person contributed. Without this person, the quality of our
3
Good Contributor
final products would have been diminished.
The person barely contributed. Without this person, the quality of our
2
Marginal Contributor
final products would have been about the same.
The person failed to contribute in any meaningful way. Other
Unsatisfactory
members of the group had to do more because of this person’s
1
Contributor
performance. Without this person, the quality of our final
products may actually have been improved.
Using the above codes, evaluate each team member (including yourself):
Contribution to
Contribution to
Team member
research
report
2. Does each team member deserve the same project grade?
Yes
No
(Circle one.)
If you answered No, who should receive higher grades and why?
If you answered No, who should receive lower grades and why?
THE CAIN PROJECT IN ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
Project Peer Evaluation Form
Your Name:___________________
Analysis of Algorithms & Data Structures
Peer evaluations are a part of each student’s project grade. Please complete this
form, place in a sealed envelope, and submit with your final report.
1. Using the scale below, evaluate your teammates on their contributions to
researching and developing the group report.
The person significantly contributed. Without this person, the
Excellent
4
quality of our final product would have been considerably
Contributor
diminished.
The person contributed. Without this person, the quality of our
3
Good Contributor
final products would have been diminished.
The person barely contributed. Without this person, the quality of our
2
Marginal Contributor
final products would have been about the same.
The person failed to contribute in any meaningful way. Other
Unsatisfactory
members of the group had to do more because of this person’s
1
Contributor
performance. Without this person, the quality of our final
products may actually have been improved.
Using the above codes, evaluate each team member (including yourself):
Contribution to
Contribution to
Team member
research
report
2. Does each team member deserve the same project grade?
Yes
No
(Circle one.)
If you answered No, who should receive higher grades and why?
If you answered No, who should receive lower grades and why?
THE CAIN PROJECT IN ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

Download Project Peer Evaluation Form - the Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication

167 times
Rate
4.8(4.8 / 5) 8 votes
ADVERTISEMENT