Form JV-443 "Eighteen-Month Permanency Attachment: Reunification Services Continued" - California

What Is Form JV-443?

This is a legal form that was released by the California Judicial Branch - a government authority operating within California. As of today, no separate filing guidelines for the form are provided by the issuing department.

Form Details:

  • Released on January 1, 2020;
  • The latest edition provided by the California Judicial Branch;
  • Easy to use and ready to print;
  • Quick to customize;
  • Compatible with most PDF-viewing applications;
  • Fill out the form in our online filing application.

Download a fillable version of Form JV-443 by clicking the link below or browse more documents and templates provided by the California Judicial Branch.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download Form JV-443 "Eighteen-Month Permanency Attachment: Reunification Services Continued" - California

1017 times
Rate (4.8 / 5) 66 votes
JV-443
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
1. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of
detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated
on the record.
Placement
2.
The child's out-of-home placement is necessary.
3.
The child's current placement is appropriate.
4.
The child's current placement is not appropriate. The county agency must locate an appropriate placement for the child.
a.
The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-440, item 27 for a
written
oral
report by the county agency on the progress made in locating an appropriate placement.
b.
Other (specify):
5.
There has been a change in the child's placement and the child is an Indian child, or there is reason to know that the child is
an Indian child. Currently (choose one):
a.
The child is placed with a member of the child's extended family as defined by 25 U.S.C. § 1903; or
b.
A diligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, the efforts are documented in
detail in the record, and the child is placed in a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe; or
Adiligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, in a foster home licensed,
c.
approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe, the efforts are documented in detail in the record, and the child is placed
in an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority; or
A diligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, in a foster home licensed,
d.
approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe, or in an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-
Indian licensing authority, the efforts are documented in detail in the record, and the child is placed in an institution for
children approved by an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization that has a program suitable to meet the Indian
child's needs; or
e.
The child is placed in accordance with the preferences established by the tribe; or
The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that there is good cause to depart from the placement preferences
f.
based on the reasons set out in the record.
The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement
6.
a.
continues to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is in the best interest of the child.
b.
does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child.
written
oral
The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-440, item 27 for a
report by the county agency on the progress made toward
(1)
returning the child to California and locating an appropriate placement within California.
(2)
locating an out-of-state placement that is the most appropriate placement for the child and in the best
interest of the child.
Other (specify):
(3)
Reunification services
7.
By clear and convincing evidence, it is in the best interest of the child to provide additional reunification
services to this
mother
biological father
Indian custodian
a.
other
presumed father
legal guardian
(specify):
Page 1 of 3
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT:
Form Approved for Optional Use
42 United States Code § 675;
Judicial Council of California
Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 366.22, 16501.1;
REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
JV-443 [Rev. January 1, 2020]
Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.708 and 5.720
www.courts.ca.gov
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
JV-443
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT: REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
1. By a preponderance of the evidence, the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a substantial risk of
detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The factual basis for this conclusion is stated
on the record.
Placement
2.
The child's out-of-home placement is necessary.
3.
The child's current placement is appropriate.
4.
The child's current placement is not appropriate. The county agency must locate an appropriate placement for the child.
a.
The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-440, item 27 for a
written
oral
report by the county agency on the progress made in locating an appropriate placement.
b.
Other (specify):
5.
There has been a change in the child's placement and the child is an Indian child, or there is reason to know that the child is
an Indian child. Currently (choose one):
a.
The child is placed with a member of the child's extended family as defined by 25 U.S.C. § 1903; or
b.
A diligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, the efforts are documented in
detail in the record, and the child is placed in a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe; or
Adiligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, in a foster home licensed,
c.
approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe, the efforts are documented in detail in the record, and the child is placed
in an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority; or
A diligent search was made for a placement with a member of the child's extended family, in a foster home licensed,
d.
approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe, or in an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-
Indian licensing authority, the efforts are documented in detail in the record, and the child is placed in an institution for
children approved by an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization that has a program suitable to meet the Indian
child's needs; or
e.
The child is placed in accordance with the preferences established by the tribe; or
The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that there is good cause to depart from the placement preferences
f.
based on the reasons set out in the record.
The child is placed outside the state of California and that out-of-state placement
6.
a.
continues to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is in the best interest of the child.
b.
does not continue to be the most appropriate placement for the child and is not in the best interest of the child.
written
oral
The matter is continued to the date and time indicated in form JV-440, item 27 for a
report by the county agency on the progress made toward
(1)
returning the child to California and locating an appropriate placement within California.
(2)
locating an out-of-state placement that is the most appropriate placement for the child and in the best
interest of the child.
Other (specify):
(3)
Reunification services
7.
By clear and convincing evidence, it is in the best interest of the child to provide additional reunification
services to this
mother
biological father
Indian custodian
a.
other
presumed father
legal guardian
(specify):
Page 1 of 3
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT:
Form Approved for Optional Use
42 United States Code § 675;
Judicial Council of California
Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 366.22, 16501.1;
REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
JV-443 [Rev. January 1, 2020]
Cal. Rules of Court, rules 5.708 and 5.720
www.courts.ca.gov
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
JV-443
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
7.
(1)
who is making significant and consistent progress in a substance abuse treatment program.
(2)
who is recently discharged from incarceration, institutionalization, or the custody of the Department of Homeland
Security and making significant and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child's return.
(3)
who was a minor parent or a nonminor dependent parent at the time of the initial hearing and is making significant
and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child's return.
and
b. There is a substantial probability that the child may be returned to the
mother
biological father
Indian custodian
other
(specify):
presumed father
legal guardian
by the date set for the 24-month permanency hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.25 because the person has
consistently and regularly contacted and visited the child;
(1)
made significant and consistent progress in the prior 18 months in resolving the problems that led to the child's removal
(2)
from the home; and
demonstrated the capacity and ability to provide for the safety, protection, physical and emotional health, and special
(3)
needs of the child and
(a)
to complete the objectives of his or her substance abuse treatment plan as evidenced by reports from a
substance abuse provider.
(b)
to complete a treatment plan postdischarge from incarceration or institutionalization.
c.
The court finds reasonable reunification services have not been provided. Based on this finding and other relevant factors,
including the likelihood of success of further reunification services and the child's need for a prompt resolution of dependency
status, the court finds good cause pursuant to Welf. and Inst. Code section 352 to continue the 18-month status review to
(specify date):
8.
Reunification services are continued for the
mother
biological father
Indian custodian
other
presumed father
legal guardian
(specify):
a.
as previously ordered.
as modified
b.
(1)
on the record.
in the case plan.
(2)
9.
The likely date by which the child may be placed for adoption, tribal customary adoption, legal guardianship, or with a fit and
willing relative, or for a child 16 years of age or older in another planned permanent living arrangement is (specify date):
Important individuals
10.
Child in out-of-home placement for six months or longer
a.
The county agency has made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the
child's relationships with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest.
b.
The county agency has not made efforts to identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the
child's relationships with those individuals, consistent with the child's best interest.
c.
To identify individuals who are important to the child and to maintain the child's relationships with those
individuals, the county agency must provide the services
(1)
as stated on the record.
as follows:
(2)
JV-443 [Rev. January 1, 2020]
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT:
Page 2 of 3
REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
JV-443
CASE NUMBER:
CHILD'S NAME:
Health
mother
biological father
Indian custodian
11.
The
other
presumed father
legal guardian
(specify):
is
unable
unwilling
unavailable
to make decisions regarding the child's needs for medical,
surgical, dental, or other remedial care, and the right to make these decisions is suspended under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 369
and vested with the county agency.
Advisement
12. The court informed all parties present at the time of the hearing and further advises all parties that if the child is not returned to the
home at the 24-month permanency hearing set on a date within 24 months from the date the child was initially removed from his or
her home, the case may be referred to a selection and implementation hearing under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26. That hearing
may result in the termination of parental rights and adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group or, in the
case of an Indian child for whom tribal customary adoption under section 366.24 is selected as the permanent plan goal,
modification of parental rights and the adoption of the child and other members of the sibling group.
Twenty-four-month permanency hearing date:
JV-443 [Rev. January 1, 2020]
Page 3 of 3
EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERMANENCY ATTACHMENT:
REUNIFICATION SERVICES CONTINUED
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22)
For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear
This Form button after you have printed the form.
Print this form
Save this form
Clear this form
Page of 3