Form ADM-2027A "Architectural and Engineering (A&e) Consultant Evaluation Form Initial Evaluation" - California

What Is Form ADM-2027A?

This is a legal form that was released by the California Department of Transportation - a government authority operating within California. As of today, no separate filing guidelines for the form are provided by the issuing department.

Form Details:

  • Released on April 1, 2020;
  • The latest edition provided by the California Department of Transportation;
  • Easy to use and ready to print;
  • Quick to customize;
  • Compatible with most PDF-viewing applications;
  • Fill out the form in our online filing application.

Download a fillable version of Form ADM-2027A by clicking the link below or browse more documents and templates provided by the California Department of Transportation.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download Form ADM-2027A "Architectural and Engineering (A&e) Consultant Evaluation Form Initial Evaluation" - California

Download PDF

Fill PDF online

Rate (4.7 / 5) 33 votes
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM
INITIAL EVALUATION
Page 1 of 2
ADM-2027A (NEW 04/2020)
Contract No.
Consultant
This scoring system is provided as a guideline for evaluating Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) that are submitted in response
to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and for evaluating consultant proposals. Scores should be based only on the information
provided in the SOQs.
(a)
(b)
(a) x (b)
Criteria
Weight
Score (0-10)
Weighted Score
1. Experience of the Consultant Contract Manager and availability.
2
2. Composition of the proposed team (professional and technical level
personnel of the prime and subconsultants) to fulfill the requirements
3
of the Scope of Work in the Request for Qualifications, including
conflict and availability.
3. Education, experience, and licensing of the key personnel to be
2
assigned.
4. Nature of completed relevant projects.
All relevant experience should include state, federal and local
1
projects (Caltrans projects will not be given a higher rate).
5. Past Performance Data.
Caltrans
Consultant Performance Evaluation
Report,
2
ADM-2031 Series
, and additional reference checks by
Caltrans staff may be used if available.
Total
Comments (continue on reverse if necessary)
I certify that I have performed an independent evaluation of the above-named consultant. I further certify that I have not engaged in discussions
within the last year with the above-named consultant regarding my future employment with said consultant.
Signature of Evaluator
Date
Printed Name of Evaluator
Checked By
Date
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms
ADA Notice
Management Unit at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM
INITIAL EVALUATION
Page 1 of 2
ADM-2027A (NEW 04/2020)
Contract No.
Consultant
This scoring system is provided as a guideline for evaluating Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) that are submitted in response
to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and for evaluating consultant proposals. Scores should be based only on the information
provided in the SOQs.
(a)
(b)
(a) x (b)
Criteria
Weight
Score (0-10)
Weighted Score
1. Experience of the Consultant Contract Manager and availability.
2
2. Composition of the proposed team (professional and technical level
personnel of the prime and subconsultants) to fulfill the requirements
3
of the Scope of Work in the Request for Qualifications, including
conflict and availability.
3. Education, experience, and licensing of the key personnel to be
2
assigned.
4. Nature of completed relevant projects.
All relevant experience should include state, federal and local
1
projects (Caltrans projects will not be given a higher rate).
5. Past Performance Data.
Caltrans
Consultant Performance Evaluation
Report,
2
ADM-2031 Series
, and additional reference checks by
Caltrans staff may be used if available.
Total
Comments (continue on reverse if necessary)
I certify that I have performed an independent evaluation of the above-named consultant. I further certify that I have not engaged in discussions
within the last year with the above-named consultant regarding my future employment with said consultant.
Signature of Evaluator
Date
Printed Name of Evaluator
Checked By
Date
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms
ADA Notice
Management Unit at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM
INITIAL EVALUATION
Page 2 of 2
ADM-2027A (NEW 04/2020)
SUGGESTED SCORING SYSTEM
FOR
A&E CALTRANS CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEES
TIER
DESCRIPTION
SCORE
• Proposer has exceptional qualifications.
• SOQ supports an extremely strong expectation of successful Project performance.
Excellent
10
• SOQ indicates significant strengths with few minor weaknesses, if any.
• SOQ contains an outstanding level of quality.
• Proposer has strong qualifications.
• SOQ supports a very good expectation of successful Project performance.
Very Good
9
• SOQ contains a few minor weaknesses that are outweighed by the strengths.
• Weaknesses, if any, are very minor and can be readily corrected.
• Proposer has adequate qualifications.
• SOQ supports a good expectation of successful Project performance.
Good
8
• SOQ contains strengths that are balanced by weaknesses.
• Weaknesses are minor and can be corrected.
• Proposer has limited qualifications.
• SOQ supports a fair expectation of successful Project performance.
Fair
7
• There are a significant number of weaknesses and very few strengths.
• Weaknesses could adversely affect successful project performance.
• Proposer has little or no qualifications.
Poor
• SOQ supports a weak expectation of successful Project performance.
0 - 6
• SOQ contains significant weaknesses with very minor strengths, if any.
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms
ADA Notice
Management Unit at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Page of 2