CAP Form 23 "Recommendation for Benchmark Candidate"

What Is CAP Form 23?

This is a legal form that was released by the U.S. Air Force - Civil Air Patrol on April 25, 2017 and used country-wide. As of today, no separate filing guidelines for the form are provided by the issuing department.

Form Details:

  • Released on April 25, 2017;
  • The latest available edition released by the U.S. Air Force - Civil Air Patrol;
  • Easy to use and ready to print;
  • Yours to fill out and keep for your records;
  • Compatible with most PDF-viewing applications;
  • Fill out the form in our online filing application.

Download a fillable version of CAP Form 23 by clicking the link below or browse more documents and templates provided by the U.S. Air Force - Civil Air Patrol.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download CAP Form 23 "Recommendation for Benchmark Candidate"

Download PDF

Fill PDF online

Rate (4.8 / 5) 54 votes
Page background image
RECOMMENDATION FOR BENCHMARK CANDIDATE
1. DATE SUBMITTED
2. SUBMITTING WING
3. AFFECTED FUNCTIONAL AREA
4. IS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED?
YES
NO
5. SUBMITTER’S WING IG NAME / CAPID
6. SUBMITTER’S EMAIL ADDRESS / PHONE NUMBER
7. BENCHMARK CANDIDATE TITLE
8. DESCRIBE THE PROCESS BELIEVED TO BE A BENCHMARK CANDIDATE
9. CLEARLY EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED PROCESS IS BETTER THAN THE CURRENT METHOD AND WHY IT SHOULD BE EMULATED CAP-WIDE
COORDINATION (Region IG)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
COORDINATION (CAP/IGI)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
COORDINATION (CAP/IG)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
DETERMINATION (NHQ Functional Lead)
BENCHMARK
NOT A BENCHMARK (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
CLOSING ACTIONS
1. SUBMITTING WING IG NOTIFIED OF DETERMINATION
2. IF DETERMINED TO BE A BENCHMARK:
A. BENCHMARK INFORMATION POSTED TO CAP IG WEB PAGE
B. NHQ FUNCTIONAL LEAD RETAINS COPY FOR CONSIDERATION DURING AFFECTED PUBLICATION(S) NEXT REVISION
CAP FORM 23, 25 APRIL 2017
RECOMMENDATION FOR BENCHMARK CANDIDATE
1. DATE SUBMITTED
2. SUBMITTING WING
3. AFFECTED FUNCTIONAL AREA
4. IS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED?
YES
NO
5. SUBMITTER’S WING IG NAME / CAPID
6. SUBMITTER’S EMAIL ADDRESS / PHONE NUMBER
7. BENCHMARK CANDIDATE TITLE
8. DESCRIBE THE PROCESS BELIEVED TO BE A BENCHMARK CANDIDATE
9. CLEARLY EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED PROCESS IS BETTER THAN THE CURRENT METHOD AND WHY IT SHOULD BE EMULATED CAP-WIDE
COORDINATION (Region IG)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
COORDINATION (CAP/IGI)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
COORDINATION (CAP/IG)
CONCUR
DO NOT CONCUR (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
DETERMINATION (NHQ Functional Lead)
BENCHMARK
NOT A BENCHMARK (Remarks required, return to submitter)
REMARKS
DATE
NAME
E-MAIL AND/OR PHONE NUMBER
CLOSING ACTIONS
1. SUBMITTING WING IG NOTIFIED OF DETERMINATION
2. IF DETERMINED TO BE A BENCHMARK:
A. BENCHMARK INFORMATION POSTED TO CAP IG WEB PAGE
B. NHQ FUNCTIONAL LEAD RETAINS COPY FOR CONSIDERATION DURING AFFECTED PUBLICATION(S) NEXT REVISION
CAP FORM 23, 25 APRIL 2017
Instructions for Completing the CAPF 23
Forms may only be submitted by wing IGs; however, the benchmark proposal can come from a subordinate unit or wing staff.
Block 1: enter date of submission
Block 2: enter submitting wing
Block 3: identify the affected functional area (e.g. aerospace education, cadet programs, operations, administration, etc.)
Block 4: check the appropriate block for attached documentation
Block 5: enter the submitting wing IG’s name and CAPID
Block 6: enter submitting wing IG’s contact information for follow-up (email address and phone number).
NOTE – if the proposal is determined to be a benchmark, submitter’s name and contact information will be posted for others
to contact when implementing the benchmark within their respective unit.
Block 7: enter the title of the benchmark candidate
Block 8: describe the process believed to be worthy of a benchmark
Block 9: clearly explain why the benchmark candidate is better than CAP’s current method and why it should be emulated CAP-wide
Send the completed form through the chain noted for staffing, review and determination.
CAP FORM 23, 25 APRIL 2017 (Reverse)
Page of 2