Form FDACS-06616 "Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Proposal Review and Scoring Criteria" - Florida

Form FDACS-06616 or the "Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Proposal Review And Scoring Criteria" is a form issued by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

Download a fillable PDF version of the Form FDACS-06616 down below or find it on the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Forms website.

ADVERTISEMENT

Download Form FDACS-06616 "Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Proposal Review and Scoring Criteria" - Florida

239 times
Rate
(4.6 / 5) 14 votes
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Division of Marketing and Development
SPECIALTY CROP BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SCORING CRITERIA
ADAM H. PUTNAM
COMMISSIONER
Proposal Number
Reviewer Number
Review Date
Score
Points
Criteria
Range
Earned
Project Purpose
a. Is the need of the project clearly communicated and
convincing?
b. Are the objectives clear and achievable?
c. Does the number of beneficiaries and the benefit to them
justify the project?
d. If a project was funded previously, will this proposal
0 - 30
expand on the previous work? Were the lessons of the
previous project applied?
e. Is this project likely to become self-sustaining and not
indefinitely dependent on federal funding?
f.
Has the applicant applied to other programs for funding?
Are other funding sources available? Is the SCBGP the
best fit for this project?
External Support
a. Is there industry support for the project?
b. Have industry groups been included as partners or
0 - 30
consulted in developing the proposal?
c. Does the project meet at least one of the identified state
priorities?
Expected Measurable Outcomes
a. Does the proposal include at least one measurable
outcome as required by the SCBGP request for
0 - 15
applications?
b. Is the measurement plan likely to accurately gather the
data required to report on the outcomes?
Budget
a. Is the amount requested reasonable and appropriate?
0 - 25
b. Are all budget items allowable, reasonable, and
necessary?
c. Are all budget items logically connected to one or more of
the project’s objectives?
Previous Performance (FDACS only)
a. If the organization previously received SCBGP funding,
-20 - 0
were reports and invoices timely and accurate?
Total
100
0
FDACS-06616 Rev. 08/18
Page 1 of 2
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Division of Marketing and Development
SPECIALTY CROP BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SCORING CRITERIA
ADAM H. PUTNAM
COMMISSIONER
Proposal Number
Reviewer Number
Review Date
Score
Points
Criteria
Range
Earned
Project Purpose
a. Is the need of the project clearly communicated and
convincing?
b. Are the objectives clear and achievable?
c. Does the number of beneficiaries and the benefit to them
justify the project?
d. If a project was funded previously, will this proposal
0 - 30
expand on the previous work? Were the lessons of the
previous project applied?
e. Is this project likely to become self-sustaining and not
indefinitely dependent on federal funding?
f.
Has the applicant applied to other programs for funding?
Are other funding sources available? Is the SCBGP the
best fit for this project?
External Support
a. Is there industry support for the project?
b. Have industry groups been included as partners or
0 - 30
consulted in developing the proposal?
c. Does the project meet at least one of the identified state
priorities?
Expected Measurable Outcomes
a. Does the proposal include at least one measurable
outcome as required by the SCBGP request for
0 - 15
applications?
b. Is the measurement plan likely to accurately gather the
data required to report on the outcomes?
Budget
a. Is the amount requested reasonable and appropriate?
0 - 25
b. Are all budget items allowable, reasonable, and
necessary?
c. Are all budget items logically connected to one or more of
the project’s objectives?
Previous Performance (FDACS only)
a. If the organization previously received SCBGP funding,
-20 - 0
were reports and invoices timely and accurate?
Total
100
0
FDACS-06616 Rev. 08/18
Page 1 of 2
Additional Information
Comments:
Funding Amount Recommended (if different from amount requested):
______________________
Proposal _______________
0
Reviewer _______________
0
FDACS-06616 Rev. 08/18
Page 2 of 2
ADVERTISEMENT
Page of 2