DEP Form 02 "Site Owner/Responsible Party Contractor Performance Survey Form - Petroleum Restoration Program" - Florida

What Is DEP Form 02?

This is a legal form that was released by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection - a government authority operating within Florida. As of today, no separate filing guidelines for the form are provided by the issuing department.

Form Details:

  • Released on April 1, 2016;
  • The latest edition provided by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection;
  • Easy to use and ready to print;
  • Quick to customize;
  • Compatible with most PDF-viewing applications;
  • Fill out the form in our online filing application.

Download a fillable version of DEP Form 02 by clicking the link below or browse more documents and templates provided by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download DEP Form 02 "Site Owner/Responsible Party Contractor Performance Survey Form - Petroleum Restoration Program" - Florida

728 times
Rate (4.8 / 5) 51 votes
Florida DEP - Division of Waste Management - Petroleum Restoration Program
SITE OWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE SURVEY FORM
FDEP Facility No. __________________
Facility Name: ___________________________________________
FDEP Contract No.: _________________
FDEP Task Assignment/Purchase Order (PO) No.: ______________
Facility Address: _____________________________________________________________________________
FDEP Contractor Name: _________________________________________
FDEP Contractor ID No: _______
Name and Title of Owner/RP Representative Completing Survey: ______________________________________
Check All Applicable: ____ Property Owner ____ Facility Owner
and/or
____ Responsible Party
Representative Signature: _______________________________
Survey Completion Date: _______________
Contractor Performance Evaluation Survey
1. The contractor did a good job communicating general project details, schedules, status and
NA
reports.
(Consistently good = 2, Some concerns = 1, No communications = 0, Not
applicable = NA)
2. The contractor provided sufficient notice of on-site activities related to assessment or cleanup.
NA
(Timely notices = 2, Some untimely notices = 1, No notices for on-site activities = 0, Not applicable =
NA)
3. The contractor effectively oversaw and coordinated on-site work to maintain reasonable ingress and
NA
egress and minimize disruption to facility operation and use.
(Good oversight/coordination = 2, Some limited disruptions = 1, Operation/use impacted = 0, Not
applicable = NA)
4. The contractor and subcontractors appeared to follow reasonable safety protocols for their staff and
NA
equipment, facility occupants, vehicle traffic and the general public.
(Protocols consistently followed = 2, Protocols inconsistently followed = 1, Failed to follow safety
protocols = 0, Not applicable = NA)
5. The contractor took reasonable precautions to prevent or avoid damage to structures or other facility
NA
assets while performing on-site work.
(No damage = 2, Minor damage = 1, Damage from inadequate precautions = 0, Not applicable = NA)
6. The contractor satisfactorily restored/repaired any damage to structures or other facility assets that may
NA
have occurred while performing on-site work.
(Satisfactory = 2, Minor unresolved damage = 1, Ongoing impacts damage = 0, Not applicable = NA)
7. If applicable, the contractor reasonably complied with special requirements that applied
to this facility (i.e., security checks or special schedule requirements for schools,
NA
airports, seaports, etc.).
(Reasonable compliance = 2, Limited Noncompliance = 1, Operations/use impacted
by noncompliance = 0, Not applicable = NA)
NA
Section Total =
_______
Section Score (Section Total / No. of Relevant Items) = _______
NA
Documentation is required for any significant non-performance issues affecting this rating (items scored 1 or less). If you have any
questions, the Department Site Manager for this project is:
Site Manager: __________________________________________
Phone: ______________________________
E-mail: ______________________________________________________
Site Owner/Responsible Party Contractor Performance Survey Form No. 02
(April 2016)
Page 5 of 5
Incorporated in 62-772.300(6)
Florida DEP - Division of Waste Management - Petroleum Restoration Program
SITE OWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE SURVEY FORM
FDEP Facility No. __________________
Facility Name: ___________________________________________
FDEP Contract No.: _________________
FDEP Task Assignment/Purchase Order (PO) No.: ______________
Facility Address: _____________________________________________________________________________
FDEP Contractor Name: _________________________________________
FDEP Contractor ID No: _______
Name and Title of Owner/RP Representative Completing Survey: ______________________________________
Check All Applicable: ____ Property Owner ____ Facility Owner
and/or
____ Responsible Party
Representative Signature: _______________________________
Survey Completion Date: _______________
Contractor Performance Evaluation Survey
1. The contractor did a good job communicating general project details, schedules, status and
NA
reports.
(Consistently good = 2, Some concerns = 1, No communications = 0, Not
applicable = NA)
2. The contractor provided sufficient notice of on-site activities related to assessment or cleanup.
NA
(Timely notices = 2, Some untimely notices = 1, No notices for on-site activities = 0, Not applicable =
NA)
3. The contractor effectively oversaw and coordinated on-site work to maintain reasonable ingress and
NA
egress and minimize disruption to facility operation and use.
(Good oversight/coordination = 2, Some limited disruptions = 1, Operation/use impacted = 0, Not
applicable = NA)
4. The contractor and subcontractors appeared to follow reasonable safety protocols for their staff and
NA
equipment, facility occupants, vehicle traffic and the general public.
(Protocols consistently followed = 2, Protocols inconsistently followed = 1, Failed to follow safety
protocols = 0, Not applicable = NA)
5. The contractor took reasonable precautions to prevent or avoid damage to structures or other facility
NA
assets while performing on-site work.
(No damage = 2, Minor damage = 1, Damage from inadequate precautions = 0, Not applicable = NA)
6. The contractor satisfactorily restored/repaired any damage to structures or other facility assets that may
NA
have occurred while performing on-site work.
(Satisfactory = 2, Minor unresolved damage = 1, Ongoing impacts damage = 0, Not applicable = NA)
7. If applicable, the contractor reasonably complied with special requirements that applied
to this facility (i.e., security checks or special schedule requirements for schools,
NA
airports, seaports, etc.).
(Reasonable compliance = 2, Limited Noncompliance = 1, Operations/use impacted
by noncompliance = 0, Not applicable = NA)
NA
Section Total =
_______
Section Score (Section Total / No. of Relevant Items) = _______
NA
Documentation is required for any significant non-performance issues affecting this rating (items scored 1 or less). If you have any
questions, the Department Site Manager for this project is:
Site Manager: __________________________________________
Phone: ______________________________
E-mail: ______________________________________________________
Site Owner/Responsible Party Contractor Performance Survey Form No. 02
(April 2016)
Page 5 of 5
Incorporated in 62-772.300(6)