DEQ Form 515-853 "Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist" - Oklahoma

What Is DEQ Form 515-853?

This is a legal form that was released by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality - a government authority operating within Oklahoma. As of today, no separate filing guidelines for the form are provided by the issuing department.

Form Details:

  • Released on July 1, 2016;
  • The latest edition provided by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality;
  • Easy to use and ready to print;
  • Quick to customize;
  • Compatible with most PDF-viewing applications;
  • Fill out the form in our online filing application.

Download a printable version of DEQ Form 515-853 by clicking the link below or browse more documents and templates provided by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Download DEQ Form 515-853 "Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist" - Oklahoma

511 times
Rate (4.5 / 5) 36 votes
CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION LANDFILL INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Facility name:
___________________________________
Permit #:
___________________________________
Date of inspection:
___________________________________
DESCRIPTION
Circle Y or N as appropriate, or N/A for any questions that are not applicable.
A “yes” answer generally denotes compliance with that requirement.
ITEM
Violations should be explained further in the narrative.
Citations listed after each requirement are from OAC 252:515 unless otherwise specified.
1
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
General
Y N N/A
1.
Has the number of groundwater monitoring wells (MW) been installed IAW approved plans (a minimum of one (1) up
gradient and two (2) down gradient MWs are required)? [9-5(b)(2)]
2.
Is each MW constructed IAW applicable requirements of the OWRB at OAC 785:35, including the following: [9-6 & 7-3]
Y N N/A
a.
Does the well casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each MW? [OAC 785:35-7-1(c)(2)((D)]
Is a concrete or cement surface pad (3’ in diameter, 3.5” thick) installed around each MW and sloped to ensure water
Y N N/A
b.
flows away from the well? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(7)(A) & (B)]
Y N N/A
c.
Does an aluminum or steel protective casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each MW?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Y N N/A
d.
Is a notch placed in the top of the well casing of each MW to mark the point of measurement for groundwater elevation?
[7-3(3)]
Y N N/A
e.
Is the latitude, longitude, and surface elevation measured by a licensed surveyor permanently marked on the well casing
of each MW? [7-3(4)]
Y N N/A
f.
Is a threaded or flanged cap or compression seal installed on top of each well casing to prevent tampering with or
contamination of the well? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(8)(A)]
Y N N/A
g.
Is the top of the protective casing of each MW fitted with a locking cap and clearly identified as a MW?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Background monitoring
Y N N/A
3.
For landfills permitted prior to April 9, 1994, has the o/o completed 2 years of background monitoring for each monitoring
well installed at that time? [9-31(a)] If no, identify which wells have not completed background.
Y N N/A
4.
Have new groundwater monitoring wells been installed after the effective date of OAC 252:515 which have not completed
background monitoring? If yes, identify the wells and their installation dates.
Y N N/A
5.
Were the newly installed groundwater monitoring wells identified in Item 1.4 sampled quarterly for one full year to
establish background water quality? [9-31(c)] If no,
Y N N/A
a.
Was the lesser amount of sampling approved by the DEQ? [9-31(c)]
Whether approved by the DEQ or not, if a lesser amount of monitoring was done, identify which wells were monitored less and the
amount of monitoring performed.
Y N N/A
6.
Immediately prior to well purging, were groundwater elevations measured in each well to determine rate and direction of
groundwater flow? [9-3(d)]
Y N N/A
7.
Each time groundwater was sampled, did the o/o perform analyses for pH, COD, and specific conductivity? [9-31(d)(2)]
Y N N/A
8.
Has all background monitoring data been submitted to the DEQ in a format prescribed by the DEQ? [9-3(e)]
Detection monitoring
Y N N/A
9.
Has the o/o begun detection monitoring? [9-71]
Y N N/A
10. Immediately prior to well purging, were groundwater elevations measured in each well to determine rate and direction of
groundwater flow? [9-3(d)]
Y N N/A
11. Is detection monitoring performed for pH, COD, and specific conductivity, or a DEQ-approved list of alternative parameters?
Revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION LANDFILL INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Facility name:
___________________________________
Permit #:
___________________________________
Date of inspection:
___________________________________
DESCRIPTION
Circle Y or N as appropriate, or N/A for any questions that are not applicable.
A “yes” answer generally denotes compliance with that requirement.
ITEM
Violations should be explained further in the narrative.
Citations listed after each requirement are from OAC 252:515 unless otherwise specified.
1
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
General
Y N N/A
1.
Has the number of groundwater monitoring wells (MW) been installed IAW approved plans (a minimum of one (1) up
gradient and two (2) down gradient MWs are required)? [9-5(b)(2)]
2.
Is each MW constructed IAW applicable requirements of the OWRB at OAC 785:35, including the following: [9-6 & 7-3]
Y N N/A
a.
Does the well casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each MW? [OAC 785:35-7-1(c)(2)((D)]
Is a concrete or cement surface pad (3’ in diameter, 3.5” thick) installed around each MW and sloped to ensure water
Y N N/A
b.
flows away from the well? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(7)(A) & (B)]
Y N N/A
c.
Does an aluminum or steel protective casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each MW?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Y N N/A
d.
Is a notch placed in the top of the well casing of each MW to mark the point of measurement for groundwater elevation?
[7-3(3)]
Y N N/A
e.
Is the latitude, longitude, and surface elevation measured by a licensed surveyor permanently marked on the well casing
of each MW? [7-3(4)]
Y N N/A
f.
Is a threaded or flanged cap or compression seal installed on top of each well casing to prevent tampering with or
contamination of the well? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(8)(A)]
Y N N/A
g.
Is the top of the protective casing of each MW fitted with a locking cap and clearly identified as a MW?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Background monitoring
Y N N/A
3.
For landfills permitted prior to April 9, 1994, has the o/o completed 2 years of background monitoring for each monitoring
well installed at that time? [9-31(a)] If no, identify which wells have not completed background.
Y N N/A
4.
Have new groundwater monitoring wells been installed after the effective date of OAC 252:515 which have not completed
background monitoring? If yes, identify the wells and their installation dates.
Y N N/A
5.
Were the newly installed groundwater monitoring wells identified in Item 1.4 sampled quarterly for one full year to
establish background water quality? [9-31(c)] If no,
Y N N/A
a.
Was the lesser amount of sampling approved by the DEQ? [9-31(c)]
Whether approved by the DEQ or not, if a lesser amount of monitoring was done, identify which wells were monitored less and the
amount of monitoring performed.
Y N N/A
6.
Immediately prior to well purging, were groundwater elevations measured in each well to determine rate and direction of
groundwater flow? [9-3(d)]
Y N N/A
7.
Each time groundwater was sampled, did the o/o perform analyses for pH, COD, and specific conductivity? [9-31(d)(2)]
Y N N/A
8.
Has all background monitoring data been submitted to the DEQ in a format prescribed by the DEQ? [9-3(e)]
Detection monitoring
Y N N/A
9.
Has the o/o begun detection monitoring? [9-71]
Y N N/A
10. Immediately prior to well purging, were groundwater elevations measured in each well to determine rate and direction of
groundwater flow? [9-3(d)]
Y N N/A
11. Is detection monitoring performed for pH, COD, and specific conductivity, or a DEQ-approved list of alternative parameters?
Revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist
Page 2
[9-71, 9-72] If a DEQ-approved list of alternative monitoring constituents is being used, identify the revised constituents.
Y N N/A
12. Is detection monitoring performed on each MW at least semi-annually? [9-73(a)] If yes, go to Item 1.13.
Y N N/A
a.
Has DEQ approved the alternative frequency? [9-73(b)]
Whether approved by the DEQ or not, if an alternative frequency is used, identify the frequency and whether it’s an alternative
frequency for all constituents or alternative frequency for certain constituents.
Y N N/A
13. For each MW, did the o/o submit cumulative analysis data for each constituent in tabular or graphical form within 60 days of
sampling? [9-74(f)]
Assessment monitoring (To be completed when assessment monitoring is required)
Y N N/A
14. Has the o/o established a DEQ-approved assessment monitoring program? [9-91(a)]
Y N N/A
15. Is assessment monitoring being performed at a frequency approved by the DEQ? [9-92] Identify the approved assessment
monitoring frequency.
Y N N/A
16. Is assessment monitoring being performed for pH, COD, and specific conductivity, as well as the OAC 252:515, Appendix C
constituents, OR a DEQ-approved set of alternative constituents? [9- 93]
Y N N/A
17. Is the o/o conducting assessment monitoring IAW the approved assessment monitoring plan? [Plan] If no, identify
deficiencies.
2
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT
Y N N/A
1.
Not applicable due to OAC 252:515-13-1(d)
3
METHANE GAS MONITORING AND CONTROL
Gas monitoring probe (GMP) installation/construction
Y N N/A
1.
Have GMPs been installed along the permit boundary, spaced at least 1000 feet apart (500 feet on any side where off-site
structures are located within 1/2 mile of the facility)? [15-4(b) & 15-4(b)(1)] If no, describe how they are installed.
Y N N/A
a.
Are the alternative spacings and/or locations approved by the DEQ? [15-4(b)(2)]
2.
Is each GMP constructed IAW applicable requirements of the OWRB at OAC 785:35, including the following:
[15-4(a) & 7-3]
Y N N/A
a. Does the GMP casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each GMP? [OAC 785:35-7-1(c)(2)((D)]
b. Is a concrete or cement surface pad (3’ in diameter, 3.5” thick) installed around each GMP and sloped to ensure water
Y N N/A
flows away from the GMP? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(7)(A) & (B)]
Y N N/A
c. Does an aluminum or steel protective casing extend a minimum of two (2) feet above the surface of each GMP?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Y N N/A
d. Is the latitude, longitude, and surface elevation measured by a licensed surveyor permanently marked on the casing of
each GMP? [7-3(4)]
Y N N/A
e. Is a threaded or flanged cap or compression seal installed on top of each well casing? [OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(8)(A)]
Y N N/A
f. Is the top of the protective casing of each GMP fitted with a locking cap and clearly identified as a MW?
[OAC 785:35-7-2(b)(9)(A)]
Y N N/A
3.
Did the o/o submit as-built drawings of the GMPs within 90 days of installation? [15-4(d)]
Routine gas monitoring
Y N N/A
4.
Is explosive gas monitoring performed at least quarterly? [15-3(c)]
Y N N/A
5.
Is the gas measuring equipment calibrated immediately prior to each sampling event? [15-3(d)]
Y N N/A
6.
Have methane levels exceeding 25% of the LEL been detected in facility structures or have methane levels exceeding the
June 2003; revised June 2006; revised September 2013; revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist
Page 3
LEL been detected at the permit boundary since the landfill’s last inspection? [15-5(a)] If no, go to Item 4.
Y N N/A
a. Did the o/o take immediate actions to protect human health? [15-5(a)(1)]
Y N N/A
b. Did the o/o immediately notify the DEQ? [15-5(a)(1)]
Y N N/A
c. Did the o/o, within seven (7) days, submit a report to the DEQ describing the steps taken to protect human health and the
levels of methane gas detected? [15-5(a)(2)]
Y N N/A
d. Did the o/o, within 30 days of detection, submit a remediation plan to the DEQ for approval, describing the nature and
extent of the problem and the proposed remedy? [15-5(a)(3)]
Y N N/A
e. Did the o/o, within 60 days of detection, implement the remediation plan? [15-5(a)(4)]
Y N N/A
f. If the plan was modified, did the o/o obtain written approval from the Department? [15-5(a)(4)(A)]
Y N N/A
g. Did the o/o notify the DEQ in writing when the remediation plan was implemented and a copy placed in the operating
record? [15-5(a)(4)(B)]
4
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Note: Contaminated stormwater includes stormwater from areas of the landfill that do not have 6” of waste-free daily cover.
Y N N/A
1.
Has the o/o established a run-on control system to prevent flow onto active portions of the facility during the peak discharge
from a 24-hour, 25-year storm? [17-2(1)]
Y N N/A
2.
Has the o/o established a run-off control system with sufficient capacity to collect and control all contaminated stormwater
resulting from a 24-hour, 25-year storm? [17-2(2)]
Y N N/A
3.
Does the o/o prevent the discharge of pollutants into waters of the US, including wetlands, that violate the federal Clean
Water Act or OPDES requirements? [17-3(a)2)]
Y N N/A
4.
Does the o/o prevent the discharge of a non-point source of pollution to waters of the US, including wetlands, that violate an
area-wide or State-wide water quality management plan that has been approved in accordance with the federal Clean Water
Act? [17-3(a)(3)]
Y N N/A
5.
If the facility has any on- or off-site soil borrow areas of 5 acres or more, does the o/o have an OPDES stormwater permit for
construction sites? [17-3(b)(2) & OAC 252:606]
5
PROHIBITED WASTES
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o prevent the disposal of hazardous, radioactive, regulated medical, and regulated PCB waste, friable asbestos, and
NHIW? [19-31(a) thru (d)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o accept only C/D waste? [19-31(e)] If no, what other types of waste are being accepted?
6
PUBLIC ACCESS CONTROL
Y N N/A
1.
Are artificial or natural barriers in place to discourage unauthorized traffic and uncontrolled dumping? [19-32] If no, describe
deficiencies noted.
7
MEASURING WASTE
Y N N/A
1.
Has the o/o installed scales? [19-33(a)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o weigh all waste upon receipt? [19-33(a)]
Y N N/A
3.
Are the scales installed at or within five miles of the facility? [19-33(a)(1)] NOTE: This restriction is not applicable to
federal or state military installations if the scales are located within the physical boundary of the installation and the landfill
only receives waste from the installation [27A §2-10-802(a)(4)]
Y N N/A
4.
Has the o/o ensured the scales are tested and certified annually in accordance with the requirements of the Oklahoma
Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry? [19-33(a)(2)] Enter date of last certification.
Y N N/A
5.
Have the scales been inoperative since the last inspection? If no, go to Item 7.6.
Y N N/A
a.
Did the o/o determine waste volume by the total volume of containers received OR total volume of the vehicle delivering
waste, whichever is applicable? [27A §2-10-802(A)(2)]
Y N N/A
b.
Did the o/o place a notice in the operating record identifying the date and time the scales became inoperative, the steps
taken to repair them, and the date use of the scales resumed? [27A §2-10-802(A)(2)]
Y N N/A
c.
If more than 30 days passed after the scales became inoperative, did the o/o give written notice to the DEQ?
[27A §2-10-802(A)(2)]
Y N N/A
6.
Has the o/o claimed fee exemptions for waste that is productively reused or recovered and sold? If no, go to Item 7.7.
Y N N/A
a.
Does the o/o maintain a written record of the weight or volume of waste received that was productively reused or
recovered and sold? [27A §2-10-802(A)(3)]
Is the reuse or recovery activity included in, and conducted in accordance with, the landfill’s permit?
Y N N/A
b.
[27A §2-10-802(A)(3)] If no, identify the calendar quarters and amounts of unauthorized fee exemptions claimed.
June 2003; revised June 2006; revised September 2013; revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist
Page 4
Y N N/A
7.
Has the o/o claimed fee exemptions for emergencies or other special events? If no, go to Item 7.8.
Y N N/A
a.
Has the DEQ approved of the exemption? [27A §2-10-802(B)(3)(b)] If no, identify the calendar quarters and amounts of
unauthorized fee exemptions claimed.
Y N N/A
8.
Has the o/o submitted a return and appropriate fees to the Department within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter, or
DEQ-approved extension? [19-33(a)(4) & 27A §2-10-802(B)(7) & (B)(8)] If yes, go to Item 7.9.
Y N N/A
a.
Did the o/o remit the appropriate penalty (5% for returns received either more than 30 days after the end of the quarter
or after the extension date; 50% for returns received more than 60 days after the end of the quarter)?
[2-10-802(B)(9) and OAC 252:515-19-33(a)(4)]
th
Y N N/A
9.
Has the o/o filed monthly reports in the operating record and with the DEQ no later than the 15
of the month following the
reporting month? [19-33(a)(5)]
8
LIMITATIONS ON WASTES RECEIVED
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o accept more than 200 tons of waste per day from locations more than 50 miles from the facility? If no, go to Item
8.2
a.
Is the landfill:
Y N N/A
(1) equipped with an approved composite liner and leachate collection system meeting the requirements of OAC
252:515? [19-34(a)(1)] AND
Y N N/A
(2) operated in full compliance with the requirements of OAC 252:515? [19-34(a)(1)] OR
Y N N/A
b.
Has the DEQ approved a temporary waiver from the requirements of 8.1.a? [19-34(b)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o accept more than 200 tons of waste per day from outside the State of Oklahoma? If no, go to Item 9.
a.
Is the landfill:
Y N N/A
(1) equipped with an approved composite liner and leachate collection system meeting the requirements of OAC
252:515? [19-34(c)(1)] AND
Y N N/A
(2) covered by an approved disposal plan meeting the requirements of OAC 252:515-19-34(d)? [19-34(c)(3)] AND
Y N N/A
(3) operated in full compliance with the requirements of OAC 252:515? [19-34(c)(4)]
Y N N/A
b.
Did the o/o reject any shipments of out-of-state waste that did not meet the requirements of the disposal plan? [19-34(e)]
9
LITTER CONTROL
Y N N/A
1.
Is blowing litter controlled by the use of litter fences near the working face or by use of a design that prevents blowing litter?
[19-35(b)(1)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o ensure unloading is performed in a manner to minimize scattering of litter? [19-35(b)(2)]
Y N N/A
3.
Has the o/o posted signs advising customers to adequately cover loads to prevent blowing litter? [19-35(b)(3)]
Y N N/A
4.
Does the o/o ensure the entire site is cleaned at least once per week, or more often if necessary? [19-35-(b)(4)]
Y N N/A
5.
Does the o/o ensure approach roadways within one-half mile of the landfill are kept clean from litter? [19-35(c)]
10
AIR QUALITY CRITERIA
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o appear to comply with all requirements of the Oklahoma Clean Air Act and rules of the Air Quality Division of
the DEQ? [19-36(a)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o prohibit the burning of solid waste? [19-36(b)]
Y N N/A
3.
Does the o/o prevent the discharge of any visible fugitive dust emissions beyond the property boundaries that may damage or
interfere with the use of adjacent properties, cause air quality standards to be exceeded, or interfere with the maintenance of
air quality standards? [19-36(c)]
11
DISEASE VECTOR CONTROL
Y N N/A
1.
Not Applicable due to OAC 252:515-19-37(b).
12
PLACEMENT OF WASTES
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o prevent solid waste from being placed in waters that communicate with waters of the State located outside the
permit boundary? [19-38(a)]
Does the o/o maintain waste-free buffer zones at least 50’ in width between all waste disposal and/or handling areas and
Y N N/A
2.
adjacent property? [19-38(b)] If yes, go to Item 12.3.
Y N N/A
a.
Has the DEQ approved the smaller buffer zone? [19-38(b)(4)]
Y N N/A
3.
If the buffer zone or other restricted areas are used for the temporary collection and storage of source-separated, recyclable
materials, is such used described in an approved recycling plan? [19-38(c)]
13
SALVAGE AND RECYCLING
Y N N/A
1. Does the o/o carry on salvage or recycling operations? If no, go to Item 14.
Y N N/A
a.
Does the o/o have an approved written operational plan for the salvage/recycling operations? [19-39(a)]
Y N N/A
b.
Does the o/o conduct salvage/recycling activities in an area away from the working face? [19-39(b)]
14
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o maintain an operating record near the landfill, containing all records concerning the planning, construction,
operation, closing, and post-closure monitoring of the landfill? [19-40(a) & (b)]
Y N N/A
2.
Does the o/o maintain the operating record until the post-closure monitoring period is terminated? [19-40(a)]
June 2003; revised June 2006; revised September 2013; revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
Construction/Demolition Landfill Inspection Checklist
Page 5
15
PROTECTIVE COVER
Y N N/A
1.
Does the o/o ensure waste is covered with at least six inches of waste-free, compacted earthen material at least once every 7
days--more frequently if necessary? [19-51(c)(1)] If yes, go to Item 16.
Y N N/A
a.
Has the o/o received DEQ approval for use of an alternative cover material or frequency? [19-51(d)] If yes, briefly
describe the alternative material that is authorized, and any special conditions on its use.
Y N N/A
b.
Is the alternative cover being used in accordance with the DEQ approval? [Permit] Briefly describe any discrepancies
between what is authorized and what is actually done.
16
INTERMEDIATE COVER
Has the o/o installed at least 18” of waste-free compacted earthen material on all areas not protected by final cover or
Y N N/A
1.
managed with run-off control structures? [19-52(a) & (c)] If yes, go to Item 16.2.
Y N N/A
a.
Has the o/o received DEQ approval for use of an alternative intermediate cover? [19-52(d)] If yes, briefly describe the
alternative cover that is approved and any special conditions on its use, if applicable.
Y N N/A
b.
Is the alternative cover being applied in accordance with the DEQ approval? [Permit] Briefly describe any discrepancies
between what is authorized and what is actually installed, if any.
Y N N/A
2.
If installed, is the intermediate cover capable of sustaining vegetation? [19-52(b)]
17
FINAL COVER
Y N N/A
1.
Has the o/o installed final cover on any portion of the landfill after the effective date of OAC 252:515? If no, go to Item 18.
2.
Does final cover include:
a barrier layer comprised of a minimum of 24” of waste-free earthen material with a hydraulic conductivity  the
Y N N/A
a.
hydraulic conductivity of any bottom liner or natural subsoils present, or  1 x 10
-5
cm/sec, whichever is less?
[19-53(a)(1) & (a)(7)] and
an erosion layer consisting of at least 1’ of waste-free soil capable of sustaining plant growth? [19-53(a)(2) & (a)(7)]
Y N N/A
b.
Y N N/A
3.
Is the final cover gradient on top of the fill 4% (25:1), or a DEQ-approved alternative gradient? [19-53(a)(3)]
Is the final side slope gradient  25% (4:1)? [19-53(a)(4)]
Y N N/A
4.
Y N N/A
5.
Is vegetation established? [19-53(a)(5)]
Y N N/A
6.
Is the final cover contoured to prevent ponding and erosion? [19-53(a)(6)]
7.
If any of Items 17.2 through 17.6 are no,
Y N N/A
a.
Has the DEQ approved the alternative final cover design? [19-53(c)] If yes, briefly describe the alternative final cover
that is approved.
Y N N/A
b.
Is the alternative final cover installed in accordance with the DEQ approval? [Permit] Briefly describe any discrepancies
between what is authorized and what is actually installed.
18
VEGETATIVE COVER
Y N N/A
1.
Does the landfill exceed 50 feet above natural surface contours & accept more than 200 tons per day of solid waste? If no, go
to Item 19.
Y N N/A
a.
Does the o/o have an approved vegetative cover plan? [27A O.S. §2-10-801.1]
Y N N/A
b.
Has the o/o established permanent or interim vegetation in all disposal areas that have been undisturbed for 90 days or
more? [19-54(1)]
Y N N/A
c.
Is the vegetation free of deep-rooted plants, trees, or other similar vegetation? [19-54(5)]
June 2003; revised June 2006; revised September 2013; revised July 2016
DEQ Form #515-853
Page of 9